The winger looked to be City’s most dangerous player and scored the equaliser, but he was substituted for the last few minutes, a move that was received with laughter by fans inside the stadium.
Even though the Leicester City supporters jeered the move, Steve Cooper did not feel bad about benching Stephy Mavididi.
Even though Mavididi scored the equaliser and posed the most threat to the Toffees defence by consistently beating James Garner, Cooper came on for the last few minutes of City’s 1-1 draw with Everton. When his number was announced, the audience jeered in response.
Cooper explained the sub by stating that Mavididi had “run his race physically” and that he was looking for a new option in Abdul Fatawu. If the circumstances were the same, he would repeat the sub.
Cooper, the City manager, stated, “He’d run his race.” “I can appreciate the fans’ annoyance. I understand and accept that. We believed that he would be our best opportunity because of his outstanding second half performance.
“But he would physically, unquestionably, run his race. That is usual for an attacking player to run out of steam, thus there’s nothing wrong with it. All we thought to do was put on new legs and give Abdul a minute or two. He participated in the corner victory.
To be clear, we’re quite pleased with Stephy and he didn’t come off as a result of his performance. He was a little off in the second half because he had to run a lot in the first half—more than we would have liked. His energy drained out. That was all there was to it.
Sometimes, after making a decision, you realise that it might not have been the best one. However, there was a good reason for it, and we would probably do it again. Simply put, Stephy ran his race physically, even though he was outstanding in the second half.
At the King Power Stadium, Mavididi’s performance in the second half spurred City to respond after a dismal first half under extreme circumstances. Prior to Saturday’s draw, Everton had lost their previous four league games, and City was second best the entire time.
While not producing any obvious opportunities, City appeared most likely to win in the closing stages. However, Cooper feels that it wasn’t one they would have earned.
Cooper stated, “It would be incorrect to try to say it was something else. We were unquestionably the stronger team in the second half, but we were nowhere near the level in the first half.” “That would also not be desired by the players.
Our intention was to assault the game and take it to Everton, but we achieved the exact opposite. We didn’t play forward or get the ball forward quickly enough, and when we did, we didn’t play with enough intensity to seriously threaten Everton’s defence.
You won’t pose a threat to any opponent’s goal if you don’t do that. We were second best in races, duels, and second balls without the ball. The objective was to set an example by leading them into one place and then letting them leave. We were losing the game, and rightfully so.
“I notified the players as well, and they were aware of it. There are two possible outcomes while playing that way. You have two options: either do as we did, or go beneath and hide, making the game even worse. Above all, we won more duels and tackles, ran a little bit more, and fought a little bit more. Indeed, they posed a threat during the counteroffensive. However, I thought we were pushing the game and acting with the proper intentions.
“Stephy made a significant impact in the second half. They were deep, and we weren’t producing many opportunities, but I thought territory would produce a chance. In the end, we scored from one and received set pieces. I assumed that we would continue and prevail after that.
“We only managed to get the point, but we were aiming for that second goal. In my opinion, the game and the outcome could have been better, but given our performance in the first half and the way the match developed, things could have gone much worse. Thus, we are only worthy of one point.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE
